Why Batman Picks And Chooses His Logic
After putting down Batman #650, I had a few thoughts about the current storyline. This is your chance to click away if you're not a Bat-fan.Still here? Okay, here we go.
When the Red Hood storyline began, I was very excited. The cat and mouse game of DC Comics versus readers regarding whether or not the new vigilante in Gotham--the Red Hood--was really Jason Todd, the Robin the Joker killed waaaaay back in Batman #428--was fun. This teaser had already been around in the Hush storyline, when Batman thought he had met an adult Jason, but in fact it turned out to be shapechanging Clayface. (As to how Clayface can mimic different clothes and voices is never explained. I mean, he's clay.)
But this Red Hood was Jason. So now readers like me were hopping in their seats, wondering how in hell DC Comics were going to explain this one. And the storyline wasn't bad. Like his ex-mentor, Jason was out to put evil out of business--but unlike dear old pseudo-BatDad, Jason did so by putting them on a morgue slab. Or whatever was left after he was finished with them. Whereas Batman will capture a drug pusher, for example, Jason simply shoots them. Or blows them up. Or uses his Kali assassin knife to...well, you get the idea.
What slowly came to light in this storyline for me was Batman's own morality. While he abhors murderers, he seemed to be dragging his feet when it came to bring Jason in. Even when Jason went and beat the living shit out of the current Robin, Batman seemed not to do anything about it. So while Batman will not rest until he brings down a killer, he just seemed paralyzed when it came to Jason.
And then Jason went and kidnapped the Joker.
Now the Joker is without a doubt the DC Universe's most homicidal maniac. He's also Batman's biggest problem. If Batman is meant to protect innocents, then the simple history of the Joker shows that allowing him to live puts those selfsame innocents in mortal danger. Because everytime the Joker escapes from Arkham Aslyum, people die. Sure, Batman will capture him, give him a beating, and throw him back into Arkham. But he always gets out. And when he does, there's a bodycount.
Even Batman's own family isn't immune. The Joker crippled Barbara Gordon. He's tormented James Gordon. And he killed Jason. And yet despite that, despite the hundreds--if not thousands--of innocent people the Joker has murdered, Batman continues to let him live.
Batman #650 confronts this issue head on. Jason, with the Joker tied up nearby, asks Batman why the Joker is still alive. He points out that had the Joker killed Batman, he would have done his best to kill him. When Batman trots out the usual response about crossing lines, Jason throws it back in his face. Jason doesn't want to execute all villians--just the Joker.
"I'm talking about him. Just him," Jason says. "And doing it because...because he took me away from you."
A nice bit of writing--and a very powerful scene. But then Batman just retreats and says he can't. Even though he's thought of torturing the Joker for what he's done, Batman won't kill him.
Then Jason kicks a gun towards Batman, puts the Joker in a headlock and puts a gun against his head. He'll blow the Joker's brains out, and he's positioned himself so that the only way Batman can stop him is by shooting Jason in the face. Jason then begins to count to three.
And Batman makes the only decision he can.
On a commercial level, there' s no way DC Comics would ever lose the Joker. In terms of Batman's mythology, the Joker is essential. Where Batman is all logic (selective as it is) and order, the Joker is his perfect foil because he's all impulse and chaos. To expect the Joker to be taken out in anything other than an 'imaginary' story is just naive. And to be honest, I wouldn't want him to go. He's as necessary to the mythos as the hold up origin, the Batcave, and need for pseudo apprentice children.
But on a pure storytelling level, Batman is once again messing up. In this storyline, he says he's out to save Jason--when it's apparent that Jason is way beyond that. His actions at the end of #650 are probably the farthest thing from protection. And let's not forget that Black Mask--a villian Batman runs up against several times in this story, and even has a conversation with him-killed his last Robin. And he does nothing to him. Black Mask tortured Stephanie Brown to death in the War Games storyline--and Batman has done nothing to bring him to justice.
So what does this say? Well, coupled with all the other mistakes Batman has made over the past two years--letting Stephanie access his private files while led to the War Games, which led to several deaths, and having his Brother I surveillance system hacked and taken over by Maxwell Lord, leading to the OMACs and even more death--it's apparent that he's lost it.
Apparently, anyone can kill a Robin and walk away. Even though there are options to dealing with the Joker outside of execution--putting him into the Phantom Zone, locking him in an spaceship with enough food and water for the duration of his life and shooting him towards the Horsehead Nebula, or whatever fantastical method of containment one can find in a comic book universe where people can run faster than light and a princess with a magic rope can make you tell the truth--Batman just puts him in a cell in an asylum with all the security of Swiss cheese.
Rumours are that in the upcoming 52 mini-series, Batman himself will be locked up in Arkham. To which I say: it's been a helluva long time coming.
Okay, Bat-rant over.




